Citation

Tong R, Wang L, Wang L, Chen X, An Y. China Saf. Sci. J. 2022; 32(12): 19-24.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, China Occupational Safety and Health Association, Publisher Gai Xue bao)

DOI

10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.12.0903

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In order to comprehensively understand the construction of curriculum politics in safety discipline, an evaluation index system was constructed. Firstly, the feasibility of applying the CIPP model for the evaluation of curriculum politics was analyzed. Secondly, based on policy documents and literatures, the index system of curriculum politics of safety discipline was constructed, including 4 primary indicators, 11 secondary indicators and 30 tertiary indicators. Then, the questionnaire was applied in practice to several universities offering safety disciplines. From the overall perspective, the current level of curriculum politics construction is not good enough with an overall evaluation score of 3. 020, the system guarantee is weak with a single score of 2. 604. There is an imbalance in resource allocation, with significant differences. From a multi⁃dimensional perspective, the teaching ability of curriculum politics in general undergraduate institutions is lacking compared with that in " Double First⁃Class" universities. The teachers of compulsory courses have a shortage of divergent thinking in curriculum politics compared with those of elective courses. The systemic system of science and technology courses is difficult to build compared with that of humanities and social sciences. © 2022 China Safety Science Journal. All rights reserved.

Language: zh