SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

You Y, Romero J, Diaz G, Evans R. Trauma care (Basel) 2023; 3(3): 108-113.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, MDPI: Multidisciplinary Digital Publications Institute)

DOI

10.3390/traumacare3030011

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Craniofacial injuries are thought to be commonly associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI), but there is conflicting evidence in the literature. This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the incidence of TBI in patients with craniofacial trauma.

METHODS: The study included 2982 consecutive patients with either solitary or concurrent diagnoses of TBI and facial fractures, seen and evaluated at a single level II trauma center between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. Continuous variables were compared against whether the patient had one or both diagnoses.

RESULTS: Of the target population, 55.8% had a solitary diagnosis of TBI; 30.28% had a solitary diagnosis of facial fractures; and 13.92% had concurrent diagnoses of both TBI and facial fractures. Patients with concurrent diagnoses had a significantly longer mean length of stay (LOS) compared to those with solitary diagnoses (9.92 ± 16.33 days vs. 6.21 ± 10.96 days, p < 0.01), but age (p = 0.68) and ICU LOS (p = 0.09) did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Trauma to the face should be given special attention due to the increased chance of TBI with craniofacial fractures. Patients with concurrent diagnoses of TBI and facial fractures had worse hospital outcomes than those with solitary diagnoses of either TBI or facial trauma.


Language: en

Keywords

concurrent diagnosis; craniofacial trauma; traumatic brain injury

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print