SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Sreeramaraju V, Babu VS, Sharma MK, Jha MK, Bhattacharya S. Indian J. Plast. Surg. 2023; 56(4): 367-372.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Medknow Publications)

DOI

10.1055/s-0043-1771516

PMID

37705817

PMCID

PMC10497327

Abstract

Background : Facial dog bite injuries result in significant emotional, psychological, and physical trauma to the victims involved and should be considered a significant health issue. The purpose of this study is to share our experience in the management and to add to the existing medical literature regarding the epidemiological patterns of facial dog bite injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS : This is a single-center retrospective observational study conducted at Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, from January 2021 to January 2022. A total of 105 patients were included. The wounds were managed according to the recommendations made by the national rabies control program and surgical intervention was performed in the form of primary suturing or flap cover.

RESULTS : Children of age group 0 to 10 years are most commonly affected. Pet dogs are the cause in 61% of cases and 57.1% of bites were provoked. Midface is most commonly affected and modified Lackmann's class 3A and 3B are the most common wounds.

CONCLUSION : In view of raising incidence of dog bites with pet dogs, the general public needs to be educated regarding the practices to prevent these injuries. Postexposure prophylaxis should be given to all affected individuals irrespective of the vaccination status of the dog. Immediate surgical intervention gives better results.


Language: en

Keywords

dog bites; face; flap cover; primary suturing; rabies post exposure prophylaxis

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print