Citation

Jojczuk M, Kamiński P, Gajewski J, Karpiński R, Krakowski P, Jonak J, Nogalski A, Głuchowski D. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2023; 30(2): 281-286.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Institute of Agricultural Medicine of Poland)

DOI

10.26444/aaem/158872

PMID

37387378

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Head and neck injuries are a heterogeneous group in terms of both clinical course and prognosis. For years, there have been attempts to create an ideal tool to predict the outcomes and severity of injuries. The aim of this study was evaluation of the use of selected artificial intelligence methods for outcome predictions of head and neck injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 6,824 consecutive cases of patients who sustained head and neck injuries, treated in hospitals in the Lublin Province between 2006-2018, whose data was provided by National Institute of Public Health / National Institute of Hygiene, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were qualified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (10th Revision). The multilayer perceptron (MLP) structure was utilized in numerical studies. Neural network training was achieved with the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) method.

RESULTS: In the designed network, the highest classification efficiency was obtained for the group of deaths (80.7%). The average value of correct classifications for all analyzed cases was 66%. The most important variable influencing the prognosis of an injured patient was diagnosis (weight 1.929). Gender and age were variables of less significance with weight 1.08 and 1.073, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Designing a neural network was hindered due to the large amount of cases and linking of a large number of deaths with specific diagnosis (S06). With a predictive value of 80.7% for mortality, ANN can be a promising tool in the future; however, additional variables should be introduced into the algorithm to increase the predictive value of the network. Further studies, including other types of injuries and additional variables, are needed to introduce this method into clinical use.

Language: en

Keywords

injury; mortality; artificial intelligence; Artificial Neural Network; head; injury scoring system; mortality prediction; neck; TBI; trauma scoring system