Citation

Have HT. Hastings Cent. Rep. 2023; 53(3): e2.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences)

DOI

10.1002/hast.1482

PMID

37285411

Abstract

War has major health consequences and poses significant ethical dilemmas for health professionals. In caring for victims of armed conflicts, health providers are obliged to put medical ethics before military aims. While the normative framework of warfare is clear and accepted by almost all countries, in practice, restrictions on violence are continuously broken, and the safety and independence of health professionals are not ensured. In bioethics, the issue of war has not been treated as a major concern. The field can do more to articulate the responsibilities of health practitioners and scientists, arguing that Red Cross founder Henri Dunant's principle of humanity and the principles of professional and global ethics reject the idea of military necessity. Bioethics should focus on strategies to prevent war, encouraging the collective action of health professionals. Bioethics should also stress-as, so far, one national medical association has-that war is a man-made public health problem.

Language: en

Keywords

public health; war; bioethics; medical ethics; military ethics