Citation

Prokosch ML, Smith CT, Kerry N, von Meding J. Polit. Life Sci. 2023; 41(2): 200-231.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Association for Politics and the Life Sciences)

DOI

10.1017/pls.2022.20

PMID

36880545

Abstract

People vary in climate change skepticism and in their views on disaster cause and prevention. For example, the United States boasts higher rates of climate skepticism than other countries, especially among Republicans. Research into the individual differences that shape variation in climate-related beliefs represents an important opportunity for those seeking ways to mitigate climate change and climate-related disasters (e.g., floods). In this registered report, we proposed a study examining how individual difference in physical formidability, worldview, and affect relate to attitudes about disaster and climate change. We predicted that highly formidable men would tend to endorse social inequality, hold status quo defensive worldviews, report lower levels of empathy, and report attitudes that promote disaster risk accumulation via lesser support for social intervention. The results of an online study (Study 1) support the notion that men's self-perceived formidability is related to disaster and climate change beliefs in the predicted direction and that this relationship is mediated by hierarchical worldview and status quo defense but not empathy. An analysis of a preliminary sample for the in-lab study (Study 2) suggests that self-perceived formidability relates to disaster views, climate views, and status quo maintaining worldviews.

Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Male; disaster risk; Floods; climate change; *Disasters; individual differences; Empathy; *Men; Climate Change; formidability