Citation

Reeves E. Fem. Leg. Stud. 2023; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s10691-022-09506-5

PMID

36818746

PMCID

PMC9925921

Abstract

There is currently unprecedented attention in Australia on the misidentification of women victim-survivors as family violence 'predominant aggressors'-this focus has largely been oriented towards the role of the police. Less research has considered court responses to misidentification and specifically, the role that legal practitioners play in recognising and responding to clients who have been misidentified. This article addresses this key gap in the literature through an exploration of 18 legal practitioners' experiences of representing misidentified clients in the civil protection order system in the Australian state of Victoria. The findings suggest that legal practitioners face a number of challenges when representing clients who have been misidentified and that the magistrates' courts are ill-equipped to respond to misidentification. As a consequence, a culture of respondents consenting to orders that should never have been made against them is maintained. This article calls for a greater focus on the role that the courts can play in providing a 'safety net' for victim-survivors who have been misidentified.

Language: en

Keywords

Australia; Law; Court responses; Family and domestic violence; Legal practice; Misidentification