Citation

Podloski B, Kelman I. Disaster Prev. Manage. 2022; 31(5): 592-600.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Emerald Group Publishing)

DOI

10.1108/DPM-06-2022-0135

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

PURPOSE This short paper compiles some potential disasters that might not have happened in 2021 even though a major hazard occurred. No definitive statements are made of what did or did not transpire in each instance. Instead, the material offers a pedagogical and communications approach, especially to encourage deeper investigation and critique into what are and are not labelled as disasters and non-disasters--and the consequences of this labelling.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH This short paper adopts a subjective approach to describing situations in 2021 in which a hazard was evident, but a disaster might not have resulted. Brief explanations are provided with some evidence and reasoning, to be used in teaching and science communication for deeper examination, verification and critique.

FINDINGS Examples exist in which hazards could have become disasters, but disasters might not have manifested, ostensibly due to disaster risk reduction. Reaching firm conclusions about so-called "non-disasters" is less straightforward.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE Many reports rank the seemingly worst disasters while research often compares a disaster investigated with the apparently worst disasters previously experienced. This short paper instead provides possible ways of teaching and communicating potential non-disasters. It offers an approach for applying lessons to encourage action on disaster risk reduction, while recognising challenges with the labels "non-disaster", "success" and "positive news".

Language: en