Citation

König A, Gollwitzer M, Steffgen G. Aust. J. Guid. Couns. 2010; 20(2): 210-224.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Australian Guidance and Counsellors Association, Publisher Australian Academic Press)

DOI

10.1375/ajgc.20.2.210

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Despite significant overlaps between victim status in traditional forms of bullying and cyberbullying, and qualitative results about self-reported reasons for cyberbullying, the role of revenge and retaliation as a motive to engage in acts of cyberbullying has not yet been examined systematically. As a first step, this study investigates whether and to what extent traditional victims, when they become cyberbullies, actually choose their former (traditional) perpetrators as targets of their own cyberbullying behavior. Furthermore, the impact of individual differences in relevant traits, such as vengefulness and justice sensitivity, on the choice of cybervictims is examined. Data from 473 students were collected via an online survey. Of these, 149 were identified as traditional victims/cyberbullies.

RESULTS show that traditionally bullied students indeed tend to choose their former perpetrators as cybervictims, and that individual differences play a role in the choice of their victims. Implications for further research, as well as for interventions and prevention programmes, are discussed.

Language: en

Keywords

bullying; cyberbullying; empathy; justice; revenge