Citation

Hadayeghi A, Shalaby AS, Persaud BN, Cheung C. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2006; 38(3): 579-589.

Affiliation

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto and Synectics Transportation Consultants Inc., St. Catharines, Ont., Canada. ahadayeghi@synectics-inc.net

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.aap.2005.12.003

PMID

16414003

Abstract

This paper examines the temporal transferability of the zonal accident prediction models by using appropriate evaluation measures of predictive performance to assess whether the relationship between the dependent and independent variables holds reasonably well across time. The two temporal contexts are the years 1996 and 2001, with updated 1996 models being used to predict 2001 accidents in each traffic zone of the City of Toronto. The paper examines alternative updating methods for temporal transfer by imagining that only a sample of 2001 data is available. The sensitivity of the performance of the updated models to the 2001 sample size is explored. The updating procedures examined include the Bayesian updating approach and the application of calibration factors to the 1996 models. Models calibrated for the 2001 samples were also explored, but were found to be inadequate. The results show that the models are not transferable in a strict statistical sense. However, relative measures of transferability indicate that the transferred models yield useful information in the application context. Also, it is concluded that the updated accident models using the calibration factors produce better results for predicting the number of accidents in the year 2001 than using the Bayesian approach.

Language: en