Citation

Weise DR, Johnson TJ, Myers TL, Hao WM, Baker S, Palarea-Albaladejo J, Scharko NK, Bradley AM, Banach CA, Tonkyn RG, Weise DR, Johnson TJ, Myers TL, Hao WM, Baker S, Palarea-Albaladejo J, Scharko NK, Bradley AM, Banach CA, Tonkyn RG. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2022; 32(1): 56-77.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, International Association of Wildland Fire, Fire Research Institute, Publisher CSIRO Publishing)

DOI

10.1071/WF22079

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Background Fire models use pyrolysis data from ground samples and environments that differ from wildland conditions. Two analytical methods successfully measured oxidative pyrolysis gases in wind tunnel and field fires: Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and gas chromatography with flame-ionisation detector (GC-FID). Compositional data require appropriate statistical analysis.Aims To determine if oxidative pyrolysis gas composition differed between analytical methods and locations (wind tunnel and field).

METHODS Oxidative pyrolysis gas sample composition collected in wind tunnel and prescribed fires was determined by FTIR and GC/FID. Proportionality between gases was tested. Analytical method and location effects on composition were tested using permutational multivariate analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test.Key results Gases proportional to each other were identified. The FTIR composition differed between locations. The subcomposition of common gases differed between analytical methods but not between locations. Relative amount of the primary fuel gases (CO, CH4) was not significantly affected by location.

CONCLUSIONS Composition of trace gases differed between the analytical methods; however, each method yielded a comparable description of the primary fuel gases.Implications Both FTIR and GC/FID methods can be used to quantify primary pyrolysis fuel gases for physically-based fire models. Importance of the trace gases in combustion models remains to be determined.

Language: en