SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kaminuma A, Matsuda Y, Wake HS. Trans. Soc. Automot. Eng. Jpn. 2015; 46(5): 957-962.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan)

DOI

10.11351/jsaeronbun.46.957

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Cars have used speech recognition and guidance for navigation systems from the early 2000s, however, the complicated mixture of multi-mode controls, such as a switch, touch panel, and speech, continues to be problematic. In this paper, we first discuss the problems with the conventional design of speech interface as equipped on a vehicle. Furthermore, to make clear the effect of equipping a spoken dialogue system, we experimentally compare the speech interface that includes natural language understanding (NLU) and spoken dialogue management (SDM) technology with the conventional speech command interface type of input. According to our evaluation, the total task time and the response time against LED stimuli showed significant differences between the two speech interface types. The NLU/SDM system showed a quicker response time for each task than did the command input system.


Language: ja

Keywords

Human Engineering; Human Interfaces; Operation amount; Speech Interface

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print