SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gries T, Müller V, Jost JT. Psychol. Inq. 2022; 33(2): 65-83.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/1047840X.2022.2065128

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Belief systems play a crucial role when it comes to guiding human information processing, evaluation, judgment, behavior, and social coordination. But why do individuals and groups adopt the specific ideologies they do? And is it possible to use the tools of economics to understand the decisions that are made in the market for ideology? To address these and related questions, we synthesize insights garnered from standard rational choice models, characteristics demand theory, and the distance theory of voting, as well as theory and research on "elective affinities" in psychology. We offer a formal analysis of the role of psychological and consumption needs in shaping the individual's choice of ideology under circumstances of uncertainty and limited resources and other constraints, including informational costs associated with learning about the potential match values of specific ideologies. After providing a few examples, we mention one non-obvious implication of our model, namely that people can be "wrong" about their own ideological preferences according to the criteria of rational consistency and utility maximization.


Language: en

Keywords

Behavioral economics; consumption preferences; formal modeling; Ideologies Are Like Possessions; political ideology; psychological needs; Shoring Up the Shaky Psychological Foundations of a Micro-Economic Model of Ideology: Adversarial Collaboration Solutions; voting

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print