Citation

Supernak J. Transportation (Amst) 1983; 12(1): 79-90.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1983, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/BF00165573

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In spite of the recent progress made in household activity analysis and travel budget studies, urban transportation modeling still remains a "not-too-well developed" research field. There are conflicting theories, analysis units are not uniform, terms are not precisely defined, basic studies of sub-systems involved are not yet completed, and many models lack behavioral background as well as basic attributes such as simplicity, sensitivity, compatibility, transferability and forecasting ability.

Gaps in methodology may be partially responsible for this situation. There is an urgent need for simple, yet not primitive, easily applicable urban transportation models which can respond to the technical needs of planners and engineers. Lessons from the past, as well as experiences from other disciplines, suggest that future research should concentrate on: (1) new, "unconventional" approaches based on systematic, basic studies of all sub-systems involved; (2) proper definition and stratification of an analysis unit; (3) revision and unification of definitions, classifications, etc., in order to improve the behavioral background of the models; (4) dynamic rather than static approaches, able to describe feedbacks between transportation and land-use as well as between transportation demand and supply; (5) interrelations between subsequent sub-models, particularly between car availability, trip generation and modal split; (6) developing models which are not only sensitive to transportation policies but also to other local policies (e.g. land use, city development, social, etc.).

Language: en

Keywords

Activity Analysis; Basic Attribute; Research Field; Stratification; Transportation