SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Raupp U, Eggers C. Monatsschr. Kinderheilkd. 1993; 141(4): 316-322.

Vernacular Title

Sexueller Missbrauch von Kindern. Eine regionale Studie uber Pravalenz und

Affiliation

Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Rheinische Landeshochschulklinik Essen.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1993, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8487794

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In contrast to angloamerican countries there are no national figures for the incidence and prevalence of sexual abuse in Germany. Reports based on criminal statistics are inappropriate and are often misinterpreted. METHODS: In this report we present the main results of a regional study of the prevalence of sexual abuse in childhood and compare them with angloamerican studies. RESULTS: Based on replies from 1009 students and apprentices (age > 18y) the prevalence for criminal sexual abuse was found to be 25.2% for females and 6.2% for males. A breakdown of these figures showed that females reported having to experience anal, oral or sexual intercourse (2.3%), physical contact (11.7%), exhibitionism (4.6%) and other sexual behaviour without physical contact (6.6%). For males the prevalence rates for these categories of sexual abuse were 1.5%, 2.4%, 0.9% and 1.5% respectively. All these figures, especially those for males, should be evaluated critically as actual prevalence rates are probably higher. Girls, particularly those aged 6-10 years, are more often involved than boys. Ninety percent of physical abuse happens with persons known to the victim (60% within the family, only 8% with strangers. In general 95% of abusers are male, however in 25% of cases of hands-on-contact with boys the abusers are female. From the relative frequency of reported abuse we estimate the potential incidence to be 1:30 within the family, 1:23 with other acquaintances and 1:6 with strangers. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of regional differences should not be underestimated. These results cannot be generalized for the whole of Germany. Only prevalence studies appropriately reflect the scale of the problem; they are necessary for a broad, a rational and a sufficient planning of strategies designed for prevention, intervention and rehabilitation. More scientifically based epidemiological studies on the extend of sexual abuse are required in Germany.


Language: de

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print