SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Noll L, Mitham K, Moran J, Mallows A. Phys. Ther. Sport 2022; 58: 141-150.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.10.010

PMID

36332354

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the current return-to-work (RTW) screening tests conducted for athletic occupations following injury and their effectiveness of reducing reinjury risk.

METHODS: A search was made of multiple databases (BioMed Central, CINAHL through ebscohost, EMBASE, Google Scholar, PUBMED, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science) from their inception to March 2022, using relevant terms to identify articles meeting predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. The search, data extraction, risk of bias, and evaluation of the certainty of the findings were completed independently by two authors. To understand the effectiveness of screening tests and their impact in reducing in reinjury rates, results were split into the following three time points: "Short-term" (≤1 year), "Medium-term" (≥2 years) and "Long-term" (≥3 years).

RESULTS: Five studies (n = 507) met the inclusion criteria. There was a very low level of certainty for the effectiveness of screening tools reducing reinjury risk at short-term, medium-term and long-term follow ups. Only one study recorded a large effect in the reducing reinjury risk.

CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated very low level of certainty for the effectiveness of screening tests reducing the risk of reinjury. A gap in our understanding currently exists for the effectiveness of RTW screening tests in tactical athletic occupations following injury and further research investigating is required.


Language: en

Keywords

Systematic review; Athlete; Return from injury; Screening test

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print