Citation

Touchet JA. Regent Univ. Law Rev. 2021; 34(2).

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Regent University School of Law)

DOI

10.2139/ssrn.3959062

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In the 1986 film Crocodile Dundee, Australian outdoorsman Mick Dundee is approached by a young man who brandishes a switchblade and demands Dundee's wallet. "He's got a knife," Dundee's companion urges him. "That's not a knife," Dundee chuckles as he produces a much larger blade. "That's a knife!" Virginia courts periodically deal with cases in which they must answer a similar question: whether a knife is a prohibited concealed weapon under Virginia law. Unfortunately, the answer to that question is not always as clear as it was to Mick Dundee. This Note addresses the treatment of switchblades and other knives in Virginia by state law, state legislators, and local law enforcement. Second, it reviews some of the perplexing cases in which Virginia courts have grappled with that law, and the resulting constitutional vagueness concerns. Third, it discusses whether the right to bear knives and other bladed weapons as "arms" is protected by the Second Amendment. Finally, it concludes by proposing solutions for the issues Virginia law poses to knife owners.

Keywords: Knife, Knives, Second Amendment, Void for Vagueness, Constitution, Virginia, Tools, Weapons, Concealed Weapons, Switchblades, Dirks, Daggers, Bowie Knives

Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3959062

Language: en

Keywords

Bowie Knives; Concealed Weapons; Constitution; Daggers; Dirks; Knife; Knives; Second Amendment; Switchblades; Tools; Virginia; Void for Vagueness; Weapons