Citation

Kerns DL, Terman DL, Larson CS. Future Child. 1994; 4(2): 119-134.

Affiliation

Department of Pediatrics, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1994, Brookings Institution)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

7804760

Abstract

Physicians become involved in child sexual abuse when they must report suspected abuse or when they are asked to medically evaluate a child who is an alleged victim of abuse. This article reviews recent progress in the medical profession's attention to child sexual abuse and discusses current issues surrounding reporting and medical evaluation. The reporting requirement raises several concerns for pediatricians. Their legal responsibilities as reporters may conflict with their traditional relationship with the family as a unit and with the confidentiality of the doctor-patient relationship. Knowledge about pediatric anogential anatomy is in a relatively early stage of development, and few pediatricians receive training adequate to enable them to determine whether medical observations are consistent with sexual abuse. Even fewer pediatricians receive training in the unique considerations and needs present when taking the medical history of a possible abuse victim or when preserving evidence for possible later use in court. The medical evidentiary evaluation of suspected sexual abuse also raises a number of concerns. There is great variability in referral patterns, which determine whether a medical examination will be requested and whether a general practice physician or a specialist will be asked to conduct the exam. Although professional medical associations have laid out broad outlines of recommended procedures for medical exams when sexual abuse is suspected, more detailed protocols are needed for addressing the many cases where findings are ambiguous or subtle. Often physicians need training in forensics and assistance in coordinating services with multiple agencies and professions. Finally, attention must be given to ensuring adequate cost reimbursement for medical evaluations.

Language: en