Citation

Howe K. Secur. Dialogue 2022; 53(4): 363-381.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/09670106221105710

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Researchers who wish to engage with survivors of conflict and violence face a range of complex ethical issues - including psychological dimensions of research - often with few resources or little support. This article draws on the author's reflections as both a trauma therapist and field researcher and bridges the fields of mental health and conflict studies to explore two questions: 1) How can a researcher reduce the possibility of retraumatizing or causing psychological harm to study participants? 2) How can she diminish the possibility of being psychologically harmed herself? The author argues that a researcher must have a foundational understanding of psychological trauma, cultivate an awareness of the differences between research and healing, sharpen her interviewing skills, and identify means of co-producing knowledge to reduce the possibility for retraumatization. Researchers can prepare themselves for the psychological impacts of research by increasing self-awareness, engaging a variety of social and professional supports, and limiting exposure to traumatic material. The author argues for institutions to increase their responsibility for the well-being of researchers. This article begins to sketch the contours of 'trauma-informed methodologies' and contributes to the broader discussion of research ethics of fieldwork and conflict.

Language: en

Keywords

Conflict; ethics; field research methods; trauma; violence