|
Citation
|
Rose-Clarke K, K PB, Magar J, Pradhan I, Shrestha P, Hassan E, Jaoude GJA, Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Devakumar D, Carrino L, Floridi G, Kohrt BA, Verdeli H, Clougherty K, Rafaeli AK, Jordans M, Luitel NP. Glob. Ment. Health (Camb.) 2022; ePub(ePub): ePub. |
|
Abstract
|
BackgroundAdolescents with depression need access to culturally relevant psychological treatment. In many low- and middle-income countries treatments are only accessible to a minority. We adapted group interpersonal therapy (IPT) for adolescents to be delivered through schools in Nepal. Here we report IPT's feasibility, acceptability, and cost.
METHODSWe recruited 32 boys and 30 girls (aged 13-19) who screened positive for depression. IPT comprised of two individual and 12 group sessions facilitated by nurses or lay workers. Using a pre-post design we assessed adolescents at baseline, post-treatment (0-2 weeks after IPT), and follow-up (8-10 weeks after IPT). We measured depressive symptoms with the Depression Self-Rating Scale (DSRS), and functional impairment with a local tool. To assess intervention fidelity supervisors rated facilitators' IPT skills across 27/90 sessions using a standardised checklist. We conducted qualitative interviews with 16 adolescents and six facilitators post-intervention, and an activity-based cost analysis from the provider perspective.
RESULTSAdolescents attended 82.3% (standard deviation 18.9) of group sessions. All were followed up. Depression and functional impairment improved between baseline and follow-up: DSRS score decreased by 81% (95% confidence interval 70-95); functional impairment decreased by 288% (249-351). In total, 95.3% of facilitator IPT skills were rated superior/satisfactory. Adolescents found the intervention useful and acceptable, although some had concerns about privacy in schools. The estimate of intervention unit cost was US $96.9 with facilitators operating at capacity.
CONCLUSIONSSchool-based group IPT is feasible and acceptable in Nepal.
FINDINGS support progression to a randomised controlled trial to assess effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Language: en |