|
Abstract
|
To know which are the most effective preventive interventions applied in school environments to reduce or delay the consumption of alcohol and tobacco in adolescents and their characteristics.
METHOD: based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA), a systematic review of the literature was carried out using the following databases: PubMed, Web of science in the Social Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded and Emergin Sources Citation Index, as well as Scopus and other sources.
RESULTS: 10 articles were included in the analysis in which it was found that the interventions that had the characteristic of relying on theory demonstrated greater effectiveness; followed by multicomponent interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a theory as support for the intervention was the characteristic that added more weight to the effectiveness of the interventions, as well as those that used some technological component.
===
Conocer cuáles son las intervenciones preventivas más efectivas aplicadas en ambientes escolares para disminuir o retrasar el consumo de alcohol y tabaco en adolescentes y sus caracteristicas. Metodo: en base a la Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura mediante las siguientes bases de datos: PubMed, Web of science en el Social Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded y Emergin Sources Citation Index, así como en Scopus y otras fuentes. Resultados: se incluyeron en el análisis 10 articulos en los que encontró que las intervenciones que tenian como caracteristica el sustentarse en teoria demostraron mayor efectivad; seguidas de las intervenciones multicomponentes.
CONCLUSIONes: La utilización de una teoria como sustento de la intervención fue la caracteristica que mas peso agregó a la efectividad de las intervenciones, al igual que aquellas que utilizaron algun componente tecnológico.
Language: es |