|
Citation
|
Mohai A, Gifford J, Herkt R, Parker A, Toder A, Dixon D, Kennedy E. Phys. Ther. Sport 2022; 57: 95-104. |
|
Abstract
|
BACKGROUND: It can be a challenge for clinicians to evaluate trauma that could represent cervical spine injury, concussion, or both. These conditions share common mechanisms of injury and symptom profiles, yet distinct aetiology and management. In the clinical evaluation of concussion, a range of standardised tools are available but the extent to which such tools include cervical spine evaluation is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To identify a variety of standardised clinical concussion evaluation tools, examine if these tools include cervical spine evaluation, and describe the characteristics of cervical spine evaluation included. To have an informed discussion about how cervical spine evaluation might best be approached after a concussion event.
DESIGN: Scoping review.
METHOD: A structured literature search was performed in eight databases to identify standardised clinical concussion evaluation tools. Each tool was then reviewed for cervical spine evaluation, and the characteristics of tools including cervical spine evaluation were described.
RESULTS: The structured search identified 82 standardised clinical concussion evaluation tools. Eleven tools included cervical spine assessment related primarily to the evaluation of red flags and symptoms, just three included physical examination.
CONCLUSION: Few standardised clinical concussion evaluation tools include cervical spine evaluation, and even fewer include physical examination. Cervical spine evaluation in concussion may benefit from closer alignment with established approaches to screening for clinically significant cervical spine injuries. In concussion, we advocate for an approach to cervical spine evaluation that includes screening for dangerous mechanisms of injury, neurological deficit, distracting injury and neck pain; and physical examination of neck range of motion and neck tenderness.
Language: en |