SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Liu HZ, Wang XZ, Sun X, Wei ZH. Asian J. Soc. Psychol. 2022; 25(3): 464-475.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Asian Association of Social Psychology and the Japanese Group Dynamics Association, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/ajsp.12509

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Various transgressions and crimes can be accomplished by individuals, but are also committed by groups. A similar transgression may have varying punishment intensities for individuals and groups, and this difference may also vary between the American and Chinese cultures. Using a questionnaire on bribery scenarios, two studies were carried out to examine the differences in punishment intensities for individuals and groups in the aforementioned two cultures.

RESULTS confirm that punishment intensities on individuals are harsher than those on groups in the American culture. In contrast, punishment intensities on individuals and groups are equally harsh in the Chinese culture. Further evidence indicates that the underlying mechanism can be attributed to the construal of agency, which mediates the moderating effect of cultural group (American vs. Chinese) on the relationship between transgression type (group vs. individual) and punishment intensity.

FINDINGS provide an in-depth understanding of the cultural differences in the punishment of individuals and groups and their underlying mechanisms.


Language: en

Keywords

construal of agency; cultural difference; difference between individuals and groups; punishment intensity

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print