Citation

Evans DD. J. Med. Ethics 1995; 21(1): 9-13.

Affiliation

Centre for Philosophy and Health Care, University College, Swansea.

Comment In:

J Med Ethics 1995;21(3):131-2

Copyright

(Copyright © 1995, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

7776355

PMCID

PMC1376524

Abstract

The use of covert video surveillance in the investigation of suspected life-threatening child abuse and Munchausen syndrome by proxy raises important ethical questions. That the recently reported provision of this facility in North Staffordshire was not presented to a Local Research Ethics Committee (LREC) for approval as a research exercise raises important questions about the ethical review of research and practice. The case made for avoiding such review is first set out and then examined. The three main premisses which form the basis of the view that LREC approval is not required are identified and tested in turn. The conclusion is that there is an undeniable element of research involved in the procedure and that the welfare of all those subjected to the surveillance would be best protected by the submission of the protocol to an independent committee for ethical assessment.

Language: en