Citation

Burema D. AI Soc. 2022; 37(2): 455-465.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s00146-021-01205-0

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This paper argues that there is a need to critically assess bias in the representations of older adults in the field of Human-Robot Interaction. This need stems from the recognition that technology development is a socially constructed process that has the potential to reinforce problematic understandings of older adults. Based on a qualitative content analysis of 96 academic publications, this paper indicates that older adults are represented as; frail by default, independent by effort; silent and technologically illiterate; burdensome; and problematic for society. Within these documents, few counternarratives are present that do not take such essentialist representations. In these texts, the goal of social robots in elder care is to "enable" older adults to "better" themselves. The older body is seen as "fixable" with social robots, reinforcing an ageist and neoliberal narrative: older adults are reduced to potential care receivers in ways that shift care responsibilities away from the welfare state onto the individual.

Language: en

Keywords

Ageism; Elder care; Human–robot interaction; Neoliberalism; Older adults; User representations