SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Doss CR, Meinzen-Dick R, Pereira A, Pradhan R. J. Rural Stud. 2022; 90: 13-25.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.01.003

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The term "feminization of agriculture" is used to describe changing labor markets that pull men out of agriculture, increasing women's roles. However, simplified understandings of this feminization persist as myths in the literature, limiting our understanding of the broader changes that affect food security. Through a review of literature, this paper analyses four myths: 1) feminization of agriculture is the predominant global trend in global agriculture; 2) women left behind are passive victims and not farmers; 3) feminization is bad for agriculture; and 4) women farmers all face similar challenges. The paper unravels each myth, reveals the complexity of gendered power dynamics in feminization trends, and discusses the implications of these for global food security.


Language: en

Keywords

Caste/Ethnicity; Gender; Joint families; Migration; Time use; Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print