Citation

Wozniak KH, Drakulich KM, Calfano BR. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 2021; 32(9): 960-991.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/08874034211005005

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Despite debates about the "material militarization" of the police, relatively little information on mass public opinion about police weapons, equipment, and gear currently exists. We analyze data from a national, opt-in panel of survey participants to assess public opinion regarding police use of 10 different types of weapons and equipment for use in confrontations with citizens. We find that public opinion defies easy classification into "militarized" versus "routine" equipment categories. Multivariate analyses indicate that perceptions of (a) police efficacy and (b) the frequency with which officers experience physical assaults on the job are the most consistent predictors of support for a range of weapons and gear, whereas perceptions of police misconduct and bias predict opposition to some types of tools. Partisan differences in attitudes between Democrats, Republicans, and Independents are less consistent predictors than broader perceptions about policing, but the effects of partisanship that are evident are substantively large.

Language: en

Keywords

militarization; police; politics; public opinion; weapons