Citation

Fortune CA, Heffernan R. Behav. Sci. Law 2021; 39(5): 678-693.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/bsl.2545

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The Psychology of Criminal Conduct and its associated components (e.g. the Risk Need Responsivity model, the Central Eight risk factors) has been hugely influential in the criminal justice sector. However, like any theory it has relative strengths and weakness, one weakness being that assumptions have been made about the causal nature and conceptual coherence of its foundational constructs, dynamic risk factors. The numerous issues with the conceptualisation of dynamic risk factors have implications for the widespread practice of using them as explanations of offending and to inform intervention planning. Recently some attention has been given to exploring the conceptualisation and definitions, scope and use of dynamic risk factors. Some key advancements in this area are considered and we illustrate how the weaknesses encountered by dynamic risk factors may impact our understanding and application of these concepts, using the example of Antisocial Personality Pattern.

Language: en

Keywords

criminogenic needs; dynamic risk factors; psychology of criminal conduct; theory