SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gerbec M, Aneziris O. Safety Sci. 2022; 152: e105774.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105774

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The increasing use of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) in shipping has led to an increased interest in marine bunkering safety in ports. The main tool for risk management and siting of bunkering facilities is quantitative risk assessment. This paper addresses the uncertainties in the available data on bunker equipment (loading and unloading arms and hoses), safety system failure rates, and ignition probabilities required for risk assessment. Using the search engines Scopus and Google, a literature search was conducted for studies and papers on the risk assessment of LPG bunkering. Analysis of the relevant studies revealed that different sources of data were used for equipment failure rates and ignition probabilities. The analysis of failure rates for leaks and ruptures of arms and hoses revealed that there are several problems with comparability, but also that there is a high degree of uncertainty, with data ranging from two to four orders of magnitude. The analysis of ignition probabilities showed that the uncertainty is about two orders of magnitude for small releases and within one order of magnitude for large releases. The failure rates of the emergency shutdown systems are within one order of magnitude. A wide range of arm and hose failure rates represents a large uncertainty for a reliable risk assessment. The way forward appears to be a transparent data collection system that describes the scope and the various assumptions.


Language: en

Keywords

Arms/hoses; Bunkering; Failure data; LNG; Probabilistic risk assessment; Uncertainties

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print