SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Rockwell AR, Bishopp SA, Orrick EA. Policing (Bradford) 2020; 44(3): 469-482.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Emerald Group Publishing)

DOI

10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2020-0128

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

PURPOSE The current study examines the effect of changing a specific use-of-force policy coupled with de-escalation training implementation on patterns of police use of force.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH An interrupted time-series analysis was used to examine changes in police use-of-force incident records gathered from a large, southwestern US metropolitan police department from 2013 to 2017 based on a TASER policy change and de-escalation training implementation mid-2015.

FINDINGS Results demonstrate that changes to use-of-force policy regarding one type of force (i.e. use of TASERs) coinciding with de-escalation training influence the prevalence of use-of-force incidents by increasing the reported police use-of-force incidents after the changes were implemented. This finding is somewhat consistent with prior literature but not always in the desired direction. Practical implications When police departments make adjustments to use-of-force policies and/or trainings, unintended consequences may occur. Police administrators should measure policy and training outcomes under an evidence-based policing paradigm prior to making those adjustments.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE This study is the first to measure the effects of changing use-of-force policy and implementing de-escalation techniques in training on patterns of police use of force and shows that these changes can have a ripple effect across types of force used by police officers.


Language: en

Keywords

De-escalation; Organizational policy; Training; Use of force

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print