Citation

Navas-Martínez MJ, Cano-Lozano MC. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 2022; 22(2): 100302.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Granada, Publisher Asociacion Espanola de Psicologia Conductual)

DOI

10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100302

PMID

35572075

PMCID

PMC9055070

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: One of the main predictors of child-to-parent violence (CPV) is childhood victimization. Recent research indicates the need to study different types of CPV aggressors. However, the distinctive characteristics of the profile of the victimized aggressor and whether these characteristics differ according to the type of victimization have not been yet analyzed. Were examined differences between four types of CPV aggressors: with family victimization, with school victimization, with polyvictimization, and without victimization experiences.

METHOD: A total of 1,559 Spanish adolescents aged between 12 and 18 years participated.

RESULTS: Compared to nonvictimized aggressors, victimized aggressors generally exercise more reactive and instrumental CPV and show more insecure parental attachment and less emotional and coping competencies. Additionally, among the types of victimization, polyvictimized aggressors show worse adjustment compared to those with a unique type of victimization. There are also significant differences according to the gender of the aggressor; however, the interaction effect between the type of aggressor and gender is not significant.

CONCLUSIONS: Considering the profile of the victimized aggressor and the type of victimization experienced in CPV can provide valuable empirical information for the approach of differential explanatory mechanisms and for the design of prevention and intervention strategies adapted to the needs of this profile.

Language: en

Keywords

Adolescents; Aggressors’ profiles; Child-to-parent violence; Descriptive survey study; Victimized aggressor