Citation

Petkus AA, Sullivan CJ, Lugo M, Newsome J. Youth Violence Juv. Justice 2022; 20(2): 139-163.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/15412040211061270

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Juvenile risk and needs assessments (JRNAs) have been the focus of extensive research in the academic literature. Prior studies have primarily focused on the risk-recidivism relationship and establishing predictive validity with juvenile populations. Less investigated is the use of risk and need assessment in practice, including how such tools are used to inform decision-making. This study uses record data encompassing 3,034 youth from a multi-state study to examine dispositional and treatment decisions associated with the Ohio Youth Assessment System (OYAS). Specifically, mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate how current practices align with underlying logic and theory regarding the role of assessments in juvenile justice.

FINDINGS reveal varied and complex relationships between assessment scores, case decisions, and recidivism. While risk was generally associated with recidivism, our results suggest juvenile risk and need assessments are inconsistently used to inform case management and placement decisions. Implications for practice and future research are also discussed.

Language: en

Keywords

Delinquency; Disposition; Juvenile Justice; Mediation; Ohio Youth Assessment System (OYAS); Risk Assessment; Risk-Needs-Responsivity; Treatment; Youth