Citation

Glowacki L, Mcdermott R. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2022; 377(1851): e20210141.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Royal Society of London)

DOI

10.1098/rstb.2021.0141

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Intergroup violence is challenging to understand: why do individuals cooperate to harm members of other groups when they themselves may be killed or injured? Despite progress in understanding the evolutionary and proximate mechanisms that underlie violence, we still have little insight into the processes that lead to the emergence of coalitionary aggression. We argue that an overlooked component is the presence of individuals who have a crucial role in initiating violence. In instigating intergroup violence, these key individuals may expect to face lower costs, receive greater benefits, or garner benefits that have a greater value to them than others. Alternatively, key individuals may be motivated by individual traits such as increased boldness, propensity for aggression or exploratory behaviour. Key individuals catalyse the emergence of coalitionary violence through one of several processes including altering the costs and benefits that accrue to others, paying a greater share of the startup costs, signalling privileged knowledge, or providing coordination, among other factors. Here we integrate diverse lines of empirical research from humans and non-human animals demonstrating that inter-individual variation is an important factor in the emergence of intergroup violence. Focusing on the role of key individuals provides new insights into how and why violence emerges.

This article is part of the theme issue 'Intergroup conflict across taxa'.

Language: en

Keywords

aggression; collective action; cooperation; impact individuals; key individuals; warfare