Citation

Groshek J, Frush Holt L. Media War Conflict 2017; 10(2): 189-207.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1750635216661650

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Media coverage surrounding the repeal of the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' (DADT) military policy was analyzed to examine how tones in coverage change over time and along the contours of increases in official consensus. In advancing the concept of indexing beyond actual military conflict, or the threat of war and honing in on a domestic but still military issue, this study examines broadcast network news coverage for a period of one year before and after DADT was repealed.

FINDINGS observed here indicate that media coverage may be more independent of official consensus than shown in previous research, specifically in reporting more negatively after official consensus was achieved. These results further suggest that coverage was moderated by network and that conceptions of indexing may not hold in the contemporary media and political environment. Implications are discussed in relation to media coverage of contentious issues and performance in polarized politics.

Language: en

Keywords

broadcast news; consensus; DADT; indexing; LGB; military coverage