SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Laursen RB, Møller V. Sport Soc. 2017; 20(12): 1838-1851.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/17430437.2017.1232352

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In establishing a valid crowd theory, it seems to have become comme il faut to criticize French mass psychologist Gustave Le Bon's mass theory. In this respect, football fan studies are no exception. A repeated criticism of Le Bon echoes in publications from scholars who analyse football fan behaviour through the Elaborated Social Identity Model (ESIM). Pioneered by Clifford Stott, the logic of the ESIM has gained ground when interactions between football fans and authorities are to be explained and understood. Therefore, it is tempting to think that the ESIM delivers a solid theoretical understanding of crowd or mass behaviour that proves Le Bon's crowd theory wrong. However, in this paper, we challenge this perception not only by questioning Drury, Reicher and Stott's interpretation of Le Bon, but also suggesting that the dialogue strategy that is based upon the ESIM, in fact, validates Le Bon's theory.


Language: en

Keywords

Corrigendum

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print