Citation

Shaffer S, Compo NS, Klemfuss JZ, Peplak J, Mejias J. Int. J. Evid. Proof 2021; 25(2): 75-92.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, SAGE Publications)

DOI

10.1177/13657127211002284

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study examined the experiences of law enforcement in investigating physical abuse, neglect and Abusive Head Trauma (AHT). Law enforcement (N = 388) in the United States were surveyed regarding case characteristics, investigative strategy, interrogative approaches, frequency/content of perpetrator admissions and interagency interaction across cases of physical abuse, neglect and AHT.

RESULTS revealed that exposure rates matched those of national statistics. AHT perpetrators reported to admit guilt less often than suspects of physical abuse and neglect. Participants reported that suspects explain physical abuse and AHT by referencing poor self-control as a common cause. Lack of financial resources was commonly reported as the explanation for neglect. Potentially coercive interviewing techniques were reported across abuse types but were more frequent in cases of AHT. AHT cases were reportedly hardest to prove/prosecute partially due to conflicting medical diagnoses. Potential implications for law enforcement investigative (interviewing) policies and future research are discussed.

Language: en

Keywords

abusive head trauma; law enforcement investigation; neglect; physical abuse; suspect interviewing