SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Douglas H, Fitzgerald R. Int. J. Evid. Proof 2021; 25(4): 350-370.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, SAGE Publications)

DOI

10.1177/13657127211036175

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Non-fatal strangulation is recognised as a common form of coercive control in violent relationships. Overwhelmingly it is perpetrated by men against women. It is dangerous both because of the immediate and serious injuries it can cause, and the risk of future violence associated with it. A discrete offence of non-fatal strangulation has been introduced in many countries. Queensland, Australia introduced a discrete non-fatal strangulation offence in 2016. While the offence is charged often, around half the non-fatal strangulation charges laid by police do not proceed. We spoke to prosecution and defence lawyers to better understand the evidential obstacles to successful prosecution. We found that the prosecution of the offence faces challenges common to family violence offences more broadly, despite it being a discrete physical act. Specifically, we found that the willingness of the victim to testify and the perception of the victim's credibility were key to successful prosecution.


Language: en

Keywords

coercive control; credibility; domestic and family violence; non-fatal strangulation; prosecution

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print