Citation

Sugar NF, Feldman KW. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 2007; 23(9): 605-616.

Affiliation

Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. nsugar@u.washington.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/PEC.0b013e318149f621

PMID

17876248

Abstract

Perineal impalements are uncommon and potentially life-threatening injuries. Medical providers must evaluate the risk of child abuse in all cases of genital or anal trauma. Determination of abuse depends on medical assessment of the mechanism of injury and statements by the child and witnesses, and may require collaboration with police or child protection agencies for scene investigation. OBJECTIVE: To describe circumstances, medical findings, and child protection issues raised in accidental pediatric perineal impalement injuries. METHODS: Retrospective case series selected from the authors' own practices and from submissions through an international list-serve of child abuse physicians. All cases included were determined to be accidental. RESULTS: Thirty-four cases were identified. Children ranged in age from 13 months to 14 years, 59% were girls. Most injuries occurred in the home (24/34, 71%), and more than one third (13/34, 38%) occurred in the bathroom. Most children had examination under anesthesia (26/34, 77%), many required surgical repair (20/34, 59%), and 4 had bowel perforations. Multidisciplinary assessment regarding child abuse was used in 71% (24/34) of cases. Inspection of the impaling objects or the scene was accomplished by medical providers or police in 50% (17/34) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory children can sustain accidental perineal impalement injuries, and severe internal injuries may accompany minor external findings. History from supervising adults and from other child witnesses, examination of the impaling objects, and investigation of the scene may be required to reach the conclusion of accidental injury.

Language: en