SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Soh SLH, Tan CW, Thomas JI, Tan G, Xu T, Ng YL, Lane J. J. Frailty Sarcopenia Falls 2021; 6(3): 131-138.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Hylonome Publications)

DOI

10.22540/JFSF-06-131

PMID

34557612

Abstract

Falls efficacy is a widely studied construct. The understanding of falls efficacy has evolved over time. Falls efficacy was initially perceived to be suitably used as a measure of fear of falling. However, further research suggested that falls efficacy and fear of falling are distinct constructs, and therefore, would be inappropriate to be used as a proxy. Instead, some researchers posited that falls efficacy is synonymous with balance confidence. Falls efficacy has been conventionally understood as the perceived ability of individuals to perform activities without losing balance or falling. A recently conducted systematic review by the authors on existing falls efficacy related measures had revealed a fresh perspective of recognising falls efficacy as a perceived ability to manage a threat of a fall. Falls efficacy, with a broadened interpreted construct, relates to the individual's perceived self-efficacy of performing necessary actions needed in different scenarios, including pre-fall, near-fall, fall-landing and completed fall. The conventional interpretation of falls efficacy needs a rethinking of perspective. An extended understanding of falls efficacy would provide an integral approach towards improving the agency of individual to deal with falls and would enhance person-centred care.


Language: en

Keywords

Rehabilitation; Falls efficacy; Older Adults; Person-centred care; Physiotherapy

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print