|
Citation
|
Goodwin GJ, Maietta JE, Ahmed AO, Hopkins NA, Moore SA, Rodrigues J, Pascual MS, Kuwabara HC, Kinsora TF, Ross SR, Allen DN. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2021; 36(6): 1143-1144. |
|
Abstract
|
OBJECTIVE
ImPACT is commonly used for sport-concussion management. Baseline and post-concussion tests serve as within-athlete comparisons for return-to-play decision-making. Previous literature has questioned whether ImPACT's five composites accurately represent the internal structure of its cognitive scores. A recent alternative four-factor structure has strong confirmatory evidence for baseline scores (Maietta et al., doi:10.1037/pas0001014). The present study examined the stability of these constructs post-concussion.
Method
The current study utilized a case-matched design (age, sex, sport category) to select a sample of 3560 high school athletes' baseline (n = 1780) and post-concussion (n = 1780) assessments. Multi-group CFA of first-order, hierarchical, and bifactor models was conducted to assess measurement invariance (configural, metric, scalar, and residual invariance) between baseline and post-concussion samples. Change in comparative fit indices was interpreted as the primary indicator of model invariance.
Results
ImPACT's five composite structure, as well as the hierarchical and bifactor models, exhibited inadequate fit to the baseline and post-concussion data. The four-factor model demonstrated superior fit in the baseline sample and good fit in the post-concussion sample. The four-factor structure demonstrated invariance across injury status (baseline to post-concussion).
Conclusion
Given that ImPACT's scores are used for return-to-play decision-making, it is important that they are psychometrically sound. Recent literature suggests that ImPACT's five composites are not an adequate representation of the cognitive constructs.
FINDINGS support validity of the four-factor structure despite injury status, suggesting these cognitive constructs are assessable at both pre- and post-concussion. Additional research is needed to determine implications of these findings for tracking cognitive change following sport-related concussion and making return-to-play decisions.
Language: en |