Citation

Yaksic E, Bulut Allred T, Drakulic C, Mooney R, De Silva R, Geyer P, Wills A, Comerford C, Ranger R. Psychol. Crime Law 2021; 27(1): 76-88.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/1068316X.2020.1774590

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The criminal justice system has allowed serial homicide offenders (SHOs) to commit additional homicides by failing to identify them after their initial homicide. Recidivism has been possible in instances where the SHO benefited from the wrongful incarceration of an innocent person for one of their homicides. Data from the National Registry of Exonerations was utilized to tabulate the full extent of these sentinel events, defined as the number of deaths that could have been prevented. Additional research was conducted to identify where victims fell in the offender's killing sequence. This ancillary data revealed the number of victims whose deaths could have been prevented had the offender been apprehended earlier in their series of homicides. Sixty-two SHOs were responsible for 249 deaths, 114 of which were committed after an innocent person was incarcerated for the SHO's initial homicide. To prevent further loss of life, law enforcement must: act upon accurate information; lower the SHO evidentiary threshold; prevent personal bias from influencing investigative steps; obtain training in the behavior of SHOs; admit mistakes; and re-examine convictions if wrongdoing is suspected.

Language: en

Keywords

Exoneration; policing; preventable homicide; sentinel event; serial homicide offender; wrongful conviction