SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Applebaum JW, MacLean EL, McDonald SE. Compr. Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2021; 7: e100071.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100071

PMID

34485952

Abstract

Love and strong social bonds are known buffers in the experience of adversity. Humans often form strong bonds with non-human animals. The human-animal bond refers to a mutually beneficial and dynamic relationship between humans and non-human animals. Previous research suggests that strong bonds with pets may promote resilience in the experience of adversity, but a strong bond with a pet can also complicate this very experience of adversity, particularly among low-resourced and disadvantaged populations. What is the role of the human-animal bond in adversity, and what is the role of adversity in the bond between a human and a non-human animal? In this article we outline the state of research on the role of various types and sources of adversities in multispecies households (i.e., families, relationships) to consider this overarching question. We focus specifically on intimate partner violence, housing discrimination, LGBTQ+ identity-based discrimination, racism, neighborhood disadvantage, and economic inequality. We then outline an agenda for future research about love, adversity, and multispecies relationships, and discuss implications for public policy and community-based interventions.


Language: en

Keywords

Adversity; Companion animals; Human-animal bond; Human-animal interaction; Multispecies families; Pets

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print