Citation

O'Dea CJ, Smith BN, Saucier DA. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 2021; 40(4): 459-481.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0261927X20969744

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

We examined majority group members' perceptions of racial slurs, compared to what we have labeled as combination terms. These combination terms possess the same semantic and pragmatic linguistic functions as racial slurs, functioning to express negative emotion toward, and to describe, a target. Across three studies (total N = 943) racial slurs were not perceived as significantly different from combination terms. We then examined whether participants higher in social dominance beliefs reported greater perceived justification for using combination terms over racial slurs because of their lack of historical denigration of marginalized groups that racial slurs have. Participants, even those higher in socially dominant attitudes, did not perceive greater justification for the use of combination terms than racial slurs. Indeed, an important implication is that race-marking, an understudied area of social psychology, paired with general derogative terms produces terms which may function similarly to racial slurs, but, fortunately, are also similarly vilified in modern society.

Language: en

Keywords

derogation; overt prejudice; pejoratives; racial slurs; racism