SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Aoki A, Kubota S, Morinaga K, Zheng NN, Wang SS, Gamada K. Int Biomech 2021; 8(1): 30-41.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/23335432.2021.1936175

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study developed a method to detect knee wobbling (KW) at low knee flexion. KW consists of quick uncontrollable medio-lateral knee movements without knee flexion, which may indicate a risk of ACL injury. Ten female athletes were recorded while performing slow, single-leg squats. Using motion capture data, the ratio of the frontal angular velocity to sagittal angular velocity (F/S) was calculated. An 'F/S spike' was defined when the F/S ratio exceeded 100%. The number of F/S spikes was counted before and after low-pass filtering at different cut-off frequencies. Intraclass correlation coefficients for KW and filtered F/S spike were analysed. KWs per squat cycle showed a median (range) of 3 (2-8) times. F/S spikes before and after low-pass filtering at 3-, 6-, 10-, and 15-Hz were 51 (12-108), 2 (0-6), 3 (1-12), 5 (2-21), and 9 (3-33) times, respectively. KWs and F/S spikes on motion capture with 6-Hz, low-pass filtering were well correlated (r = 0.76). Median percentages of valgus and varus F/S spikes were 71% and 29%, respectively. After 6Hz, low-pass filtering, the number of F/S spikes was strongly correlated with observed KWs. An F/S spike assessment may be used to objectively detect KW, including flexion and varus/valgus angular velocity.


Language: en

Keywords

knee kinematics; knee wobbling; Single-leg squat

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print