Citation

Lyrintzis AS, Liu G, Michalopoulos PG. Transp. Res. Rec. 1994; 1457: 174-183.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1994, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Five high-order continuum traffic flow models are compared: Payne's original model, Papageorgiou's improved model, the semiviscous model and the viscous model, a proposed high-order model, and the simple continuum model based on the pipeline cases. The stability of the high-order models is analyzed and the shock structure investigated in all models. In addition, the importance of the proper choice of finite-difference method is addressed. For this reason, three explicit finite-difference methods for numerical implementation--the Lax method, the explicit Euler method, and the upwind scheme with flux vector splitting--are discussed. The test with hypothetical data and the comparison of numerical results with the field data suggest that high-order models implemented through the upwind method are more accurate than the simple continuum model. For congested cases, the proposed high-order model appears to be more accurate than the other high-order models for all cases tested.

Language: en

Keywords

Mathematical models; Highway traffic control; Numerical analysis; Computer simulation; Highway systems; Numerical methods; Finite difference method