Citation

Cavanaugh JM, Walilko T, Walbridge A, Huang Y, King AI. Proc. Stapp Car Crash Conf. 1994; 38: 293-308.

Affiliation

Wayne State Univ

Copyright

(Copyright © 1994, Society of Automotive Engineers SAE)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Thirty-seven SID side impact sled tests were performed using a rigid wall and a padded wall with fourteen different padding configurations. The Thoracic Trauma Index (TTI) and Average Spine Acceleration (ASA) were measured in each test. TTI and ASA were evaluated in terms of their ability to predict injury in identical cadaver tests and in terms of their ability to predict the harm or benefit of padding of different crush strengths. SID ASA predicted the injury seen in WSU-CDC cadaver tests better than SID TTI. SID ASA predicted that padding of greater than 20 psi crush strength is harmful (ASA gt; 40 g's). SID TTI predicted that padding of greater than 20 psi crush strength is beneficial (TTI less than 85 g's). SID TTI predicts the benefit of lower impact velocity. However, SID ASA appears more useful in assessing the harm or benefit of door padding or air bags.

Language: en