Citation

Wagenaar AC, Harwood EM, Silianoff C, Toomey TL. Eval. Program Plann. 2005; 28(4): 359-367.

Affiliation

Dept of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0177, USA (wagenaar@ufl.edu)

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.07.001

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Although there are many valuable evaluations of alcohol control policies, most do not account for the complexities of the policies, such as variability across jurisdictions, conceptual multi-dimensionality, implementation procedures and enforcement mechanisms. We conducted a detailed analysis of state beer keg registration policies in US. Based on reviews of keg registration statutes and regulations and surveys of alcohol beverage control agency officials in each of the 21 states with a keg registration law, three independent coders examined seven core conceptual components. Laws varied considerably in statutory and regulatory provisions and implementation procedures. No state specifically provided for enforcement, education or training regarding keg registration laws, and most did not fully specify penalty or benefit provisions. Future policy evaluation studies should include reliable coding of multiple policy dimensions and characteristics, and incorporate continuous measures of policy quality, not a simple dichotomy indicating presence or absence of a policy.