Citation

Cherney A, Belton E. Dyn. Asymm. Confl. 2020; 13(3): 193-211.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/17467586.2019.1680854

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The evaluation of interventions aimed at countering violent extremism (CVE) remains an underdeveloped field. While various evaluation frameworks and metrics have been proposed in the literature, few have been tested against actual program data. The same observation applies to theories of disengagement, which can provide guidance on the types of changes CVE program evaluations should aim to measure. In this paper, we use one theory of extremist disengagement - Barrelle's pro-integration model (PIM) - to examine outcomes for clients who have participated in an Australian intervention targeting convicted terrorists and prison inmates identified as at risk of radicalization, the Proactive Integrated Support Model (PRISM) intervention. PRISM has been operated by Corrective Services New South Wales since 2016. The PIM looks at extremist disengagement across five domains - "Social Relations", "Coping", "Identity", "Ideology" and "Action Orientation" - with each constituted by a series of sub-domains. We undertake an exploratory case study across three PRISM clients and code different data sources for observations related to these five PIM domains. The aim is to inform CVE evaluation design and decisions about the types of metrics that can be used to assess programs targeting individuals at risk of radicalization or convicted of terrorism. We acknowledge limitations in the study's design.

Language: en

Keywords

Countering violent extremism; deradicalization; evaluation; interventions; pro-integration; radicalized offenders