Citation

Burton AL, Pickett JT, Jonson CL, Cullen FT, Burton VS. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 2021; 58(3): 269-305.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0022427820953202

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:The recurring mass murder of students in schools has sparked an intense debate about how best to increase school safety. Because public opinion weighs heavily in this debate, we examine public views on how best to prevent school shootings. We theorize that three moral-altruistic factors are likely to be broadly relevant to public opinion on school safety policies: moral intuitions about harm, anger about school crime, and altruistic fear.

METHODS:We commissioned YouGov to survey 1,100 Americans to explore support for a range of gun control and school programming policies and willingness to pay for school target hardening. We test the ability of a moral-altruistic model to explain public opinion, while controlling for the major predictors of gun control attitudes found in the social sciences.

RESULTS:The public strongly supports policies that restrict who can access guns, expand school anti-bullying and counseling programs, and target-harden schools. While many factors influence attitudes toward gun-related policies specifically, moral-altruistic factors significantly increase support for all three types of school safety policies.

CONCLUSIONS:The public favors a comprehensive policy response and is willing to pay for it. Support for prevention efforts reflects moral intuitions about harm, anger about school crime, and altruistic fear.

Language: en

Keywords

emotions; gun control; morality; public opinion; school shootings