Citation

Alam A, Gupta A, Gupta N, Yelamanchi R, Bansal L, Durga C. Pol. Przegl. Chir. 2021; 93(2): 9-15.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Panstwowy Zaklad Wydawnictw Lekarskich)

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0014.7394

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

PURPOSE: Trauma is the leading cause of mortality in people below the age of 45 years. Abdominal trauma constitutes one-fourth of the trauma burden. Scoring systems in trauma are necessary for grading the severity of the injury and prior mobilization of resources in anticipation. The aim of this study was to evaluate RTS, ISS, CASS and TRISS scoring systems in blunt trauma abdomen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective single-center study was conducted on 43 patients of blunt trauma abdomen. Revised trauma score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Clinical Abdominal Scoring System (CASS) and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) were calculated and compared with the outcomes such as need for surgical intervention, post-operative complications and mortality.

RESULTS: The majority of the study subjects were males (83.7%). The most common etiology for blunt trauma abdomen as per this study was road traffic accident (72.1%). Spleen was the most commonly injured organ as per the study. CASS and TRISS were significant in predicting the need for operative intervention. Only ISS significantly predicted post-operative complications. All scores except CASS significantly predicted mortality.

CONCLUSIONS: Among the scoring systems studied CASS and TRISS predicted the need for operative intervention with good accuracy. For the prediction of post-operative complications, only the ISS score showed statistical significance. ISS, RTS and TRISS predicted mortality with good accuracy but the superiority of one score over the other couldn't be proved.

Language: en

Keywords

Revised trauma score; Injury Severity Score; Clinical Abdominal Scoring System; Trauma and Injury Severity Score; Blunt trauma abdomen;